btrfs: use buffer xarray for extent buffer writeback operations

btrfs: use buffer xarray for extent buffer writeback operations

Currently we have this ugly back and forth with the btree writeback
where we find the folio, find the eb associated with that folio, and
then attempt to writeback.  This results in two different paths for
subpage ebs and >= page size ebs.

Clean this up by adding our own infrastructure around looking up tagged
ebs and writing the ebs out directly.  This allows us to unify the
subpage and >= pagesize IO paths, resulting in a much cleaner writeback
path for extent buffers.

I ran this through fsperf on a VM with 8 CPUs and 16GiB of RAM.  I used
smallfiles100k, but reduced the files to 1k to make it run faster, the
results are as follows, with the statistically significant improvements
marked with *, there were no regressions.  fsperf was run with -n 10 for
both runs, so the baseline is the average 10 runs and the test is the
average of 10 runs.

smallfiles100k results
      metric           baseline       current        stdev            diff
================================================================================
avg_commit_ms               68.58         58.44          3.35   -14.79% *
commits                    270.60        254.70         16.24    -5.88%
dev_read_iops                  48            48             0     0.00%
dev_read_kbytes              1044          1044             0     0.00%
dev_write_iops          866117.90     850028.10      14292.20    -1.86%
dev_write_kbytes      10939976.40   10605701.20     351330.32    -3.06%
elapsed                     49.30            33          1.64   -33.06% *
end_state_mount_ns    41251498.80   35773220.70    2531205.32   -13.28% *
end_state_umount_ns      1.90e+09      1.50e+09   14186226.85   -21.38% *
max_commit_ms                 139        111.60          9.72   -19.71% *
sys_cpu                      4.90          3.86          0.88   -21.29%
write_bw_bytes        42935768.20   64318451.10    1609415.05    49.80% *
write_clat_ns_mean      366431.69     243202.60      14161.98   -33.63% *
write_clat_ns_p50        49203.20         20992        264.40   -57.34% *
write_clat_ns_p99          827392     653721.60      65904.74   -20.99% *
write_io_kbytes           2035940       2035940             0     0.00%
write_iops               10482.37      15702.75        392.92    49.80% *
write_lat_ns_max         1.01e+08      90516129    3910102.06   -10.29% *
write_lat_ns_mean       366556.19     243308.48      14154.51   -33.62% *

As you can see we get about a 33% decrease runtime, with a 50%
throughput increase, which is pretty significant.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>