riscv: select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER

riscv: select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER

Currently, riscv linux requires at least IMA, so all platforms have a
multiplier. And I assume the 'mul' efficiency is comparable or better
than a sequence of five or so register-dependent arithmetic
instructions. Select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER to get slightly nicer
codegen. Refer to commit f9b4192923fa ("[PATCH] bitops: hweight()
speedup") for more details.

In a simple benchmark test calling hweight64() in a loop, it got:
about 14% performance improvement on JH7110, tested on Milkv Mars.

about 23% performance improvement on TH1520 and SG2042, tested on
Sipeed LPI4A and SG2042 platform.

a slight performance drop on CV1800B, tested on milkv duo. Among all
riscv platforms in my hands, this is the only one which sees a slight
performance drop. It means the 'mul' isn't quick enough. However, the
situation exists on x86 too, for example, P4 doesn't have fast
integer multiplies as said in the above commit, x86 also selects
ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER. So let's select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER
which can benefit almost riscv platforms.

Samuel also provided some performance numbers:
On Unmatched: 20% speedup for __sw_hweight32 and 30% speedup for
__sw_hweight64.
On D1: 8% speedup for __sw_hweight32 and 8% slowdown for
__sw_hweight64.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240325105823.1483-1-jszhang@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>