bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example
authorAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 16 Feb 2022 04:31:51 +0000 (15:31 +1100)
committerStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 03:46:51 +0000 (14:46 +1100)
commit2d25ec866de36a5225b6e6310089c69e1c030785
treefb846629183c812512e15b21e95baee4729214e9
parent502ea4f6d3937875766d97c4fbeb5b5a580fd421
bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example

It's not obvious that bitfield.h doesn't guarantee the bits.h inclusion
and the example in the former is confusing.  Some developers think that
it's okay to just include bitfield.h to get it working.  Change example to
explicitly include necessary headers in order to avoid confusion.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220207123341.47533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Fixes: 3e9b3112ec74 ("add basic register-field manipulation macros")
Depends-on: 8bd9cb51daac ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@semihalf.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
include/linux/bitfield.h