KVM: nVMX: Document that ignoring memory failures for VMCLEAR is deliberate
authorSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:42:24 +0000 (15:42 +0000)
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:16:49 +0000 (12:16 -0500)
commit057b18756b464729bc787ed4e6b44abb9f5c3a38
tree9f7e85ac843dfb58fe3e6a12aea47f86981c1a03
parent53800f88d414525d3fdc5c84629faa0b6bc35b3b
KVM: nVMX: Document that ignoring memory failures for VMCLEAR is deliberate

Explicitly drop the result of kvm_vcpu_write_guest() when writing the
"launch state" as part of VMCLEAR emulation, and add a comment to call
out that KVM's behavior is architecturally valid.  Intel's pseudocode
effectively says that VMCLEAR is a nop if the target VMCS address isn't
in memory, e.g. if the address points at MMIO.

Add a FIXME to call out that suppressing failures on __copy_to_user() is
wrong, as memory (a memslot) does exist in that case.  Punt the issue to
the future as open coding kvm_vcpu_write_guest() just to make sure the
guest dies with -EFAULT isn't worth the extra complexity.  The flaw will
need to be addressed if KVM ever does something intelligent on uaccess
failures, e.g. to support post-copy demand paging, but in that case KVM
will need a more thorough overhaul, i.e. VMCLEAR shouldn't need to open
code a core KVM helper.

No functional change intended.

Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527765 ("Error handling issues")
Fixes: 587d7e72aedc ("kvm: nVMX: VMCLEAR should not cause the vCPU to shut down")
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20221220154224.526568-1-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c