closures: fix a race on wakeup from closure_sync
authorKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:25:45 +0000 (21:25 +0800)
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:08:31 +0000 (08:08 -0600)
The race was when a thread using closure_sync() notices cl->s->done == 1
before the thread calling closure_put() calls wake_up_process(). Then,
it's possible for that thread to return and exit just before
wake_up_process() is called - so we're trying to wake up a process that
no longer exists.

rcu_read_lock() is sufficient to protect against this, as there's an rcu
barrier somewhere in the process teardown path.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
drivers/md/bcache/closure.c

index 73f5319295bc9c1c8a3caf47ac7b7ab4ee5cfcdd..c12cd809ab1938c3aedf64e86c30dfeb0655b354 100644 (file)
@@ -105,8 +105,14 @@ struct closure_syncer {
 
 static void closure_sync_fn(struct closure *cl)
 {
-       cl->s->done = 1;
-       wake_up_process(cl->s->task);
+       struct closure_syncer *s = cl->s;
+       struct task_struct *p;
+
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       p = READ_ONCE(s->task);
+       s->done = 1;
+       wake_up_process(p);
+       rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 void __sched __closure_sync(struct closure *cl)