sched/fair: Don't assign runtime for throttled cfs_rq
authorLiangyan <liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:16:33 +0000 (20:16 +0800)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:55:07 +0000 (08:55 +0200)
do_sched_cfs_period_timer() will refill cfs_b runtime and call
distribute_cfs_runtime to unthrottle cfs_rq, sometimes cfs_b->runtime
will allocate all quota to one cfs_rq incorrectly, then other cfs_rqs
attached to this cfs_b can't get runtime and will be throttled.

We find that one throttled cfs_rq has non-negative
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining and cause an unexpetced cast from s64 to u64
in snippet:

  distribute_cfs_runtime() {
    runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1;
  }

The runtime here will change to a large number and consume all
cfs_b->runtime in this cfs_b period.

According to Ben Segall, the throttled cfs_rq can have
account_cfs_rq_runtime called on it because it is throttled before
idle_balance, and the idle_balance calls update_rq_clock to add time
that is accounted to the task.

This commit prevents cfs_rq to be assgined new runtime if it has been
throttled until that distribute_cfs_runtime is called.

Signed-off-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: shanpeic@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xlpang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: d3d9dc330236 ("sched: Throttle entities exceeding their allowed bandwidth")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190826121633.6538-1-liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/sched/fair.c

index bc9cfeaac8bd26464c55a42e93b105967ea92c3b..500f5db0de0ba86a331586d4189e3b299cb6148e 100644 (file)
@@ -4470,6 +4470,8 @@ static void __account_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 delta_exec)
        if (likely(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0))
                return;
 
+       if (cfs_rq->throttled)
+               return;
        /*
         * if we're unable to extend our runtime we resched so that the active
         * hierarchy can be throttled
@@ -4673,6 +4675,9 @@ static u64 distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b,
                if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
                        goto next;
 
+               /* By the above check, this should never be true */
+               SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0);
+
                runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1;
                if (runtime > remaining)
                        runtime = remaining;