Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it
If we attempt to clone a 0 length region into a file we can end up
inserting a range in the inode's extent_io tree with a start offset
that is greater then the end offset, which triggers immediately the
following warning:
[ 3914.619057] WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 4199 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3914.620886] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3914.638093] Call Trace:
[ 3914.638636] [<
ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3914.639620] [<
ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3914.640789] [<
ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.642041] [<
ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3914.643236] [<
ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.644441] [<
ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3914.645711] [<
ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3914.646914] [<
ffffffff8142b2fb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3914.648058] [<
ffffffffa03cbac4>] ? test_range_bit+0xcc/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3914.650105] [<
ffffffffa03cb3c3>] lock_extent+0x13/0x15 [btrfs]
[ 3914.651361] [<
ffffffffa03db39e>] lock_extent_range+0x3d/0xcd [btrfs]
[ 3914.652761] [<
ffffffffa03de1fe>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x278/0x388 [btrfs]
[ 3914.654128] [<
ffffffff811226dd>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[ 3914.655320] [<
ffffffffa03e0909>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x2195 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3914.669271] ---[ end trace
14843d3e2e622fc1 ]---
This later makes the inode eviction handler enter an infinite loop that
keeps dumping the following warning over and over:
[ 3915.117629] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4228 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3915.119913] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3915.137394] Call Trace:
[ 3915.137913] [<
ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3915.139154] [<
ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3915.140316] [<
ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.141505] [<
ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3915.142709] [<
ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.143849] [<
ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3915.145120] [<
ffffffffa038c1e3>] ? btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
[ 3915.146352] [<
ffffffff811548f6>] ? deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
[ 3915.147565] [<
ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3915.148785] [<
ffffffff8142b7e2>] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3915.149931] [<
ffffffffa03bc325>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x196/0x482 [btrfs]
[ 3915.151154] [<
ffffffff81168904>] evict+0xa0/0x148
[ 3915.152094] [<
ffffffff811689e5>] dispose_list+0x39/0x43
[ 3915.153081] [<
ffffffff81169564>] evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb
[ 3915.154062] [<
ffffffff81154418>] generic_shutdown_super+0x49/0xef
[ 3915.155193] [<
ffffffff811546d1>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
[ 3915.156274] [<
ffffffffa038c1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3915.167404] ---[ end trace
14843d3e2e622fc2 ]---
So just bail out of the clone ioctl if the length of the region to clone
is zero, without locking any extent range, in order to prevent this issue
(same behaviour as a pwrite with a 0 length for example).
This is trivial to reproduce. For example, the steps for the test I just
made for fstests:
mkfs.btrfs -f SCRATCH_DEV
mount SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
$CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 4096 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
umount $SCRATCH_MNT
A test case for fstests follows soon.
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>